The world is reeling under the threat of war and destruction, leading to higher levels of uncertainty for the economy. Apart from making efforts for peace and harmony, can something prevent such situations? According to the American Psychological Association, societies marked by increasing division would benefit tremendously from being kind and cooperative and demonstrating tolerance toward others. Furthermore, the research recommends embracing empathy, as all other virtues can be found under its umbrella. Additionally, it has been labelled as the "psychological superglue' that connects people and undergirds cooperation and kindness (Zaki, 2019).

Like societies, organizations also survive on various psychological factors that influence team dynamics, shape individual behaviours and corporate practices, and foster a welcoming and safe workplace. The origin of empathy research in business organizations can be traced back to the recognition of the importance of understanding and addressing interpersonal dynamics within the workplace. This recognition led researchers to explore the role of empathy in improving communication, collaboration, and overall organizational performance. Some initial studies in organizational behaviour began to shed light on the potential benefits of empathy in the workplace. (Roberge, 2013). Such studies confirmed that empathy can promote positive employee relationships, increasing job satisfaction and productivity(Hallin et al., 2018).

Furthermore, research has shown that empathy is significant in leadership effectiveness and ethical decision-making within organizations (Cuzzo et al., 2017). Empathy extends beyond relationships between coworkers and employees, as well. Additionally, businesses must show empathy for the people who make up their stakeholders, including clients, customers, and local community members. By understanding and considering the perspectives and needs of these stakeholders, organizations can better align their products and services (Roberge, 2013; Hallin et al., 2018; Knorring et al., 2022) and corporate social responsibility initiatives.

In the backdrop of the latest war in the Middle East, understanding and promoting empathy has become increasingly important for organizations involved in conflict resolution and peacebuilding efforts. Empathy can humanize the experiences of individuals affected by conflict, fostering understanding and compassion in a volatile environment (Yao et al., 2021). Research has shown that empathy facilitates better communication and builds trust among conflicting parties, leading to more effective conflict-resolution strategies. Additionally, empathy can help organizations identify the needs and concerns of different stakeholders in conflict situations, allowing for more inclusive and comprehensive approaches to peacebuilding.

Empathy has been recognized as a powerful tool for promoting peace and resolving conflicts. This process is at the heart of kindness and building peace, and it has been found to mediate the link between interacting with people from different groups and lowering prejudice (Taylor et al., 2022). For effective conflict resolution and peacebuilding, it is essential to comprehend the various elements of empathy and how they affect intergroup conflicts (Bruneau et al., 2017). Moreover, empathy has been associated with positive intergroup attitudes and support for less aggressive actions, even during conflict escalation (Neufeld et al., 2021). Furthermore, empathy for the victimized outgroup within the perpetrator groups can predict support for restitution to make up for the wrongs the ingroup perpetrated. Empathy in the context of the latest war in the Middle East can play a significant role in promoting understanding, dialogue, and, ultimately, sustainable peace. Amid the most recent Middle East conflict, organizations and individuals may foster discussion and understanding by putting empathy first. These settings facilitate the exchange of ideas, stories, and feelings, which can assist in humanizing the dispute and dispel stereotypes and prejudices. Empathy could be a revolutionary political instrument and a non-violent form of resistance. It can mend relationships and advance democracy, peace, and human rights. Even if they are thousands of miles away, people can use empathy as a social feeling to connect with those directly impacted by the crises. Additionally, studies have demonstrated that empathy can encourage passive harm and inhibit charity, underscoring the complicated nature of its impact on intergroup disputes (Bruneau et al., 2017). Perhaps it is high time that organizations place empathy on a high pedestal by including it in their policies & and training programs. Finally, it should be mandatory for leaders to demonstrate empathy so that it can be imitated across organizations, societies and the world at large.

References

1. Bruneau, E.G., Cikara, M. and Saxe, R. (2017) ‘Parochial empathy predicts reduced altruism and the endorsement of passive harm’, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(8), pp. 934–942. doi:10.1177/1948550617693064.
   CrossRef
2. Cuzzo, M.S. et al. (2017) ‘How do you effectively teach empathy to students?’, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2017(151), pp. 61–78. doi:10.1002/tl.20249.
   CrossRef
3. Hallin, J., Mantel, N.A. and Carter, C. (2018) ‘What purpose does a company serve in the world? Swedish students and sustainability professionals in dialogue on corporate sustainability’, Journal of Business Theory and Practice, 6(3), p. 202. doi:10.22158/jbtp.v6n3p202.
   CrossRef
4. Knorring, J. et al. (2022) ‘Empathy as a silent art–a doctor´s daily balancing act: A qualitative study of senior doctors’ experiences of empathy’, PLOS ONE, 17(12). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277474.
   CrossRef
5. Neufeld, K.H. et al. (2021) ‘“The more you know”: Critical historical knowledge about Indian residential schools increases non?indigenous Canadians’ empathy for indigenous peoples’, Political Psychology, 43(4), pp. 617–633. doi:10.1111/pops.12783.
   CrossRef
6. Noor, M. and Nazneen, S. (2016) ‘To connect is to be influenced: What determines a third?party’s forgiveness attitudes to conflicting groups’ violent partisan members?’, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 20(1), pp. 3–10. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12148.
   CrossRef
7. Roberge, M.-E. (2013) ‘A multi-level conceptualization of empathy to explain how diversity increases group performance’, International Journal of Business and Management, 8(3). doi:10.5539/ijbm.v8n3p122.
   CrossRef
8. Taylor, L.K., Tomaši? Humer, J. and Dautel, J.B. (2022) ‘Predictors of out?group empathy among majority and minority children in a conflict?affected society’, Children & Society, 36(5), pp. 949–967. doi:10.1111/chso.12549.
   CrossRef
9. Yi, K. et al. (2021) ‘Empathic psychology: A code of risk prevention and control for behavior guidance in the multicultural context’, Frontiers in Psychology, 12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781710.
   CrossRef
10. Zaki, J. (2019). How to increase empathy and Unite Society, The Economist. Available at: https://www.economist.com/open-future/2019/06/07/how-to-increase-empathy-and-unite-society (Accessed: October 17, 2023).